anti roll bar

Suspension Tuning, Troubleshooting, Design and Discussion

Moderators: David Lemmond, Dave Morgan

Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
a1elec
Posts: 241
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:47 pm
Location: chicago

anti roll bar

#1 Post by a1elec » Fri Feb 10, 2006 5:45 pm

i have seen anti roll bars on 4 link cars. im converting to ladder bars and need to know if i need to retain bar. my chassis guy says i dont need it. any thoughts? thanks john :roll:

User avatar
Bob West
Posts: 582
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Republic,Mo

#2 Post by Bob West » Fri Feb 10, 2006 7:09 pm

Are the 4 link mounts going to interfere with the antiroll bar mounts? If not, I think I'd try it both ways, what can it hurt?
72 Malibu-Nov. '08-1.329-3.995-6.280@106.94-9.988@131.62
best 60ft to date- 1.319
http://www.dragtimes.com/1972-Chevrolet ... -5251.html

David Lemmond
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 2:26 pm
Location: Somerville, Al.
Contact:

#3 Post by David Lemmond » Fri Feb 10, 2006 11:19 pm

I think it depends on the power. A high powered car can benefit from the roll bar IMO. Its hard to put a number on it, but I'd say anything over 2900 lbs that 60's in the 1-teens could benefit.
David Lemmond's Race Shop
Somerville, Al.
256-778-8888
Specializing in 10.5 tire cars chassis, suspension, and components.
67-69 Camaro, 68-74 Nova Tubular A-arms.
62-67 Chevy II tubular A-arms.

User avatar
CoMax Racing
Posts: 169
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:40 pm
Location: Edmonton Alberta Canada

Anti-roll bar

#4 Post by CoMax Racing » Sat Feb 11, 2006 10:54 am

I agree with David. I have had great success with anti-roll bars on the faster cars. I also agree with the range of speed and 60's. I have found that without the anti-roll bars the cars needed a pretty good amount of pre-load. After installation the pre-load can be removed and the cars launched like they were on a rail. Plus you said you had one already, if it's there I would just keep it.

one_fast_camaro
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 11:12 pm
Location: atlanta, GA

#5 Post by one_fast_camaro » Sat Feb 11, 2006 2:47 pm

How fast would you consider fast enough to need one?

User avatar
CoMax Racing
Posts: 169
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:40 pm
Location: Edmonton Alberta Canada

Anti Roll bar

#6 Post by CoMax Racing » Sat Feb 11, 2006 3:38 pm

As Dave said if your car is getting into the teens for 60 foot times your definatly shocking the tire hard enough to warrant an anti-roll bar. I would say 1.20 sec and faster 60's would like one.

User avatar
a1elec
Posts: 241
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:47 pm
Location: chicago

ANTI ROLL

#7 Post by a1elec » Sat Feb 11, 2006 4:05 pm

:( THANKS FOR THE REPLIES. YES THE MOUNTS ARE THERE BUT THEY ARE OUTSIDE THE FRAME RAILS AND IN THE WHEEL TUBS. WE REMOVED THEM FOR TIRE CLEARANCE. THE 4 LINK AND ANTI ROLL LOOK HOMEMADE. VERY NICE WORK BUT NOT A KIT. IVE THROWN TO MUCH MONEY AT IT FOR NOW SO IL TRY WITHOUT IT. WE CAN ADD ONE LATER. THANKS JOHN

User avatar
CoMax Racing
Posts: 169
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:40 pm
Location: Edmonton Alberta Canada

Anti roll bar.

#8 Post by CoMax Racing » Sat Feb 11, 2006 8:59 pm

Good idea. The roll bar torsion links should be located at the housing mounts for what ever type of suspension you use. If they were outside the tub :shock: I wonder what buddy was trying to do.

Good Luck

User avatar
CoMax Racing
Posts: 169
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:40 pm
Location: Edmonton Alberta Canada

Roll bar

#9 Post by CoMax Racing » Sat Feb 11, 2006 9:00 pm

That should have been " outside the frame :shock: "

Good Luck Again

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests