John Heard, you think this will work better?

Suspension Tuning, Troubleshooting, Design and Discussion

Moderators: David Lemmond, Dave Morgan

Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
the deuce
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:48 am

John Heard, you think this will work better?

#1 Post by the deuce » Thu Aug 04, 2011 6:43 am

I listened to your advise and have reconstruct the upper shock mounts and turned them 90 degrees. It was kinda tricky because I wanted them adjustable...

https://picasaweb.google.com/1067971278 ... 5278966082

Tell me what you think, I may have missed something.

Thanks
Matt
1963 Chevy II
383 Engine
350 Transmission

User avatar
John_Heard
Site Admin
Posts: 5734
Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 11:20 am
Location: Resume Speed, Kansas
Contact:

Re: John Heard, you think this will work better?

#2 Post by John_Heard » Fri Aug 05, 2011 6:41 am

That will certainly keep the top half of the shock from binding when the rear end rotates.

Don't know if you'll have issues with the bottom or not. This would be the style of mount I'd suggest using, but you want to avoid getting the axle tube hot when welding them on, that can warp the rear end. Really I don't know if you'll have any issues with the setup you have, just pointing out what would be ideal.

Image

User avatar
the deuce
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:48 am

Re: John Heard, you think this will work better?

#3 Post by the deuce » Fri Aug 05, 2011 3:36 pm

Thanks for helping me out John!

It was kind of a challenge building those upper mounts from a 1/4" thick L profile with only an angle grinder, Mig/mag welder & drilling machine :) The big issue was that I wanted them adjustable, if I had made fixed mounts it would have been a breeze...

I assume, in a perfect world the lower eyes should have been 90 degrees from what I have now aswell, but the Caltracs plates are made to have the shocks like I have now so I guess it will work. Now, when the upper mounts wont bind when the axle rotate I guess that would help the whole shock from binding, but I dont know, maybe Im wrong.

I've seen those mounts but I dont want to weld the axle tubes because its just coming from the jig and have been straightened. I know what a little heat can do with those rearends :)

Matt
1963 Chevy II
383 Engine
350 Transmission

User avatar
Craig W.
Posts: 1257
Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 11:01 am
Location: Columbia, KY
Contact:

Re: John Heard, you think this will work better?

#4 Post by Craig W. » Sat Aug 06, 2011 6:47 pm

Did Calvert buy out Rancho or are they just rebadging the shock?
Craig Watson
2QuickNovas Racing
5.23@131

Sponsors:
AEM Electronics
Carnivore Performance
Rapp Racing
VFN Fiberglass
Fast Shafts

User avatar
the deuce
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:48 am

Re: John Heard, you think this will work better?

#5 Post by the deuce » Sun Aug 07, 2011 3:54 am

Craig,

Really dont know, but this is what Calvert website says; "Formally known as Rancho, is now officially a Calvert Brand."

Matt
1963 Chevy II
383 Engine
350 Transmission

User avatar
chpcamaro
Posts: 773
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 1:28 am
Location: socali

Re: John Heard, you think this will work better?

#6 Post by chpcamaro » Sun Aug 07, 2011 12:46 pm

wow sounds like they did i will find out for sure this week i need to go see john for some more caltracs so i will ask him what the deal is :?:
best to date N/A 8.91@153
psca westcoast heads up racing open comp
67 Camaro RS/SS
BBC Powerglide 4800 stall 4.11 29.5x10.5W
http://www.chpdragracing.com

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests