four link tubes

Suspension Tuning, Troubleshooting, Design and Discussion

Moderators: David Lemmond, Dave Morgan

Post Reply
Message
Author
440altered
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 1:57 am

four link tubes

#1 Post by 440altered » Mon Dec 29, 2008 3:37 am

Is there an ideal length for four link tubes? if so does it vary with application and why? Sorry if it's a bit basic.
Thanks.

David Lemmond
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 2:26 pm
Location: Somerville, Al.
Contact:

Re: four link tubes

#2 Post by David Lemmond » Mon Dec 29, 2008 1:53 pm

I'm not sure there is an ideal length. Short bars are stronger but make a larger instant center change per adjustment, as they go down the track, with the car moving up and down around the rearend housing. Longer bars give up strength or have to use larger diameter and or thicker tubing to make up for being long. Longer bars have a more finie instant center change per adjustment.
The most common bar length used by Bickel, jones, and Mcamis is 23" from the center of the housing to the front rod end center.
David Lemmond's Race Shop
Somerville, Al.
256-778-8888
Specializing in 10.5 tire cars chassis, suspension, and components.
67-69 Camaro, 68-74 Nova Tubular A-arms.
62-67 Chevy II tubular A-arms.

User avatar
bigblue466
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:15 pm

Re: four link tubes

#3 Post by bigblue466 » Mon Feb 02, 2009 7:04 pm

I have seen some that have shorter tubes on top? Why is that?
"Overtired & Cornpowered"

vanillagorilla
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:52 pm

Re: four link tubes

#4 Post by vanillagorilla » Mon Feb 02, 2009 7:56 pm

From what I understand, the tube is shorter on top for packaging reasons. They still have to fit within the confines of a car's floor.
2000 Sierra-More cubes...looking for more boost.
1992 Typhoon-almost, mostly, sort of, kind of stock ;)
1969 Mullet-Mobile-too much work

User avatar
BillyShope
Posts: 169
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 7:03 am
Location: Orlando, FL
Contact:

Re: four link tubes

#5 Post by BillyShope » Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:39 pm

bigblue466 wrote:I have seen some that have shorter tubes on top? Why is that?
There is an optimum ratio, of upper and lower link lengths, for a given car. This is because, as the front of the car rises on launch, the link angles change and, consequently, the instant center moves. With the right length ratio, it's possible to maintain the same percent antisquat as the front rises.

There's a spreadsheet at my site to determine the optimum ratio for your car.
http://home.earthlink.net/~whshope
over 130,000 visitors

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests