Is there an ideal length for four link tubes? if so does it vary with application and why? Sorry if it's a bit basic.
Thanks.
four link tubes
Moderators: David Lemmond, Dave Morgan
-
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 2:26 pm
- Location: Somerville, Al.
- Contact:
Re: four link tubes
I'm not sure there is an ideal length. Short bars are stronger but make a larger instant center change per adjustment, as they go down the track, with the car moving up and down around the rearend housing. Longer bars give up strength or have to use larger diameter and or thicker tubing to make up for being long. Longer bars have a more finie instant center change per adjustment.
The most common bar length used by Bickel, jones, and Mcamis is 23" from the center of the housing to the front rod end center.
The most common bar length used by Bickel, jones, and Mcamis is 23" from the center of the housing to the front rod end center.
David Lemmond's Race Shop
Somerville, Al.
256-778-8888
Specializing in 10.5 tire cars chassis, suspension, and components.
67-69 Camaro, 68-74 Nova Tubular A-arms.
62-67 Chevy II tubular A-arms.
Somerville, Al.
256-778-8888
Specializing in 10.5 tire cars chassis, suspension, and components.
67-69 Camaro, 68-74 Nova Tubular A-arms.
62-67 Chevy II tubular A-arms.
- bigblue466
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:15 pm
Re: four link tubes
I have seen some that have shorter tubes on top? Why is that?
"Overtired & Cornpowered"
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:52 pm
Re: four link tubes
From what I understand, the tube is shorter on top for packaging reasons. They still have to fit within the confines of a car's floor.
2000 Sierra-More cubes...looking for more boost.
1992 Typhoon-almost, mostly, sort of, kind of stock
1969 Mullet-Mobile-too much work
1992 Typhoon-almost, mostly, sort of, kind of stock
1969 Mullet-Mobile-too much work
- BillyShope
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 7:03 am
- Location: Orlando, FL
- Contact:
Re: four link tubes
There is an optimum ratio, of upper and lower link lengths, for a given car. This is because, as the front of the car rises on launch, the link angles change and, consequently, the instant center moves. With the right length ratio, it's possible to maintain the same percent antisquat as the front rises.bigblue466 wrote:I have seen some that have shorter tubes on top? Why is that?
There's a spreadsheet at my site to determine the optimum ratio for your car.
http://home.earthlink.net/~whshope
over 130,000 visitors
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests